Page 40 - 2022
P. 40

parameters  and  levels  based  on  conducted  pilot  experiments.  Pilot  experiments
          conducted  by  adopting  one  factor  at-a-time  approach  (OFAT)  due  to  multiple  levels  of
          multiple variables need to study. The aim of the present work is to explore the impacts of
          the  different  process  parameters  on  the  response  parameters.  Standard  practice  has
          been adopted for the Design of the Experiment (DOE) and carried out the experimental
          work.  DOE  performed  using  Response  Surface  Methodology  (RSM)  (i.e.,  Central
          Composite Design (CCD)). Experimental work has been performed with various process
          parameters  such  as  air  pressure,  standoff  distance,  nozzle  diameter,  mass  flow  rate,
          abrasive temperature and mixing chamber rotating speed and studied their effect on the
          performance parameters like Material Removal Rate (MRR) in gm/min, Perpendicularity
          (PR) in degree and Concentrated Diameter (CD) in mm.
          ANOVA was carried out to identify the effect of individual input process parameters. The
          Study depicts that air pressure is a more significant parameter for MRR with 37.16 %,
          Stand  of  distance  (SOD)  is  a  more  significant  parameter  for  Perpendicularity  (PR)  and
          Concentrated  Diameter  (CD)  with  38.29  %  and  27.93  %  respectively.  GRA  and  MOORA
          methods have been adopted to optimize the process parameters and results comparison
          of both the methods have been carried out for validation purposes. Results obtained from
          both  the  methods  identified  that  the  19th  set  of  results  gives  the  best  output
          performance  with  multiple  input  process  parameters  amongst  the  conducted  52
          experiments. The confirmation test was conducted for the process parameters specified
          in the 19th row and achieved the MRR, PR and CD with maximum errors of 2.99%, 1.65%
          and  3.61%  respectively.  The  percentage  of  errors  obtained  is  very  less  and  below  the
          acceptable limit as per the standard industry practices.

          Key words: AJM, RSM, MOORA, CD and PR.


























                                                                                             09
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45